121 results for 'court:"Federal Circuit"'.
J. Chen finds that the patent board improperly ruled in a dispute over an "Apparatus, Method and System for a Tunneling Client Access Point" in determining unpatentability as to several claims. Reversed in part.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Chen, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 5/3/24, Categories: Patent
J. Moore finds that the district court improperly dismissed patent infringement claims concerning electrical outlet covers for lack of jurisdiction because defendant purposely directed patent enforcement activities toward the competing manufacturer in Utah. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Moore, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 2023-1184, Categories: Patent, Jurisdiction
J. Stark finds that the district court improperly granted enhanced damages for willful infringement in this patent action because the patent claims were invalid, and the action should be remanded for dismissal on mootness grounds. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stark, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 2022-2064, Categories: Civil Procedure, Patent
J. Prost finds that the district court improperly dismissed patent claims for lack of standing because the company retained an interest in the patent through the security agreement. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Prost, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 2022-2207, Categories: Patent, Contract
J. Lourie finds that a manufacturer of a hair products was properly granted judgment in trademark claims concerning the "#TODECACHO" mark because the company sufficiently pleaded a likeliness of confusion.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Lourie, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 2023-1142, Categories: Trademark
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Bryson finds that the claims court properly dismissed claims in which inmates seek monetary relief and contend their imprisonment is unlawful due to tribal treaties which deprive the government of prosecuting and incarcerating them, as the treaty provisions are not money-mandating and do not fall within the reach of the Tucker Act. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Bryson, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 2023-1898, Categories: Native Americans, Prisoners' Rights
J. Dyk finds that the claims court improperly ruled against an Indian tribe in various claims concerning water rights and water related infrastructure because the Tucker Act sufficiently establishes the U.S.'s duty to properly manage existing water infrastructure. Reversed in part.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Dyk, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 2021-1880, Categories: Property, Native Americans, Water
J. Bencivengo finds that the court of federal claims improperly ruled in claims brought under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act stemming from injuries suffered by a minor after receiving several immunizations because the court misinterpreted the term "surgical intervention." Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Bencivengo, Filed On: April 15, 2024, Case #: 2023-1032, Categories: Tort
J. Stark finds that the district court improperly determined a patent for dining mats for toddlers was invalid as obvious because while a reasonable fact finder could determine the prior art describes a self-sealing function, one could just as well not find that to be the case.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stark, Filed On: April 12, 2024, Case #: 2022-1905, Categories: Patent
J. Lourie finds that the district court properly ruled in this patent dispute concerning the drug Xifaxan, which is used to treat intestinal issues, on grounds that the claims were invalid for obviousness. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Lourie, Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: 22-2153, Categories: Patent
J. Hughes finds that the court of international trade properly dismissed this appeal for lack of jurisdiction over customs and border protection's assessment of countervailing and antidumping duties because the importer failed to exhaust administrative remedies. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Hughes, Filed On: April 8, 2024, Case #: 22-2079, Categories: Commerce, Trade, Jurisdiction
J. Reyna finds that the district court properly ruled in this dispute over patents for a "method and system for fast access to advanced visualization of medical scans using a dedicated web portal" because the asserted claims are tied to an abstract idea, and the company failed to establish the idea may be converted into a patent-eligible invention. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Reyna, Filed On: April 4, 2024, Case #: 2022-2109, Categories: Patent
J. Hughes finds that the court of international trade properly ruled in this antidumping dispute because evidence indicates U.S. Steel did not reimburse an affiliated U.S. importer for antidumping duties. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Hughes, Filed On: April 4, 2024, Case #: 22-2078, Categories: Commerce, Trade
J. Prost finds that the district court improperly ruled that the patent for medicine that treats schizophrenia in adults was not obvious. Reversed in part.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Prost, Filed On: April 1, 2024, Case #: 2022-1258, Categories: Patent
J. Chen finds that the court of international trade properly classified imported net wraps because the wraps did not constitute "parts" of harvesting or other agricultural machinery. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Chen, Filed On: March 7, 2024, Case #: 23-1210, Categories: Agriculture, Trade
J. Taranto finds that the district court improperly ruled in infringement claims concerning a patent for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries because the claim constructions were not contradictory. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: March 6, 2024, Case #: 23-1194, Categories: Patent
J. Stark finds that the trial court improperly dismissed an appeal brought under the Contract Disputes Act concerning an FDA contract because the civilian board of contract appeals failed to provide the company an opportunity to be heard.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stark, Filed On: March 6, 2024, Case #: 22-1784, Categories: Civil Procedure, Contract
J. Lourie finds that the patent trial and appeal board improperly ruled in a dispute over a patent directed to "immunogenic compositions comprising conjugated Streptococcus pneumoniae capsular saccharide antigens for use in pneumococcal vaccines" because evidence does not support the determination that the proposed claims were obvious. Affirmed in part.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Lourie, Filed On: March 5, 2024, Case #: 19-1871, Categories: Patent
J. Moore finds that the district court improperly ruled in this dispute over patents related to "improvements in web-based advertising" because genuine issues remain in dispute as to whether the company "establishes characterizations for respective users." Affirmed in part.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Moore, Filed On: March 5, 2024, Case #: 2022-1756, Categories: Patent
J. Dyk finds that the arbitrator properly ruled in this wrongful termination dispute because the U.S. made reasonable efforts to provide the employee notice of termination before the end of the probationary period. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Dyk, Filed On: March 4, 2024, Case #: 2023-2015, Categories: Civil Procedure, Employment
J. Taranto finds that the court of federal claims properly ruled in claims brought by involuntarily retired members of the Coast Guard because their involuntary retirements were not part of a reduction in force and thus were unlawful. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: March 1, 2024, Case #: 3/1/24, Categories: Employment, Military
J. Moore finds that the veteran's court properly granted an appeal from an adverse decision regarding the caregiver program because veterans and caregivers had a right to dispute a decision that had been made based on the their inability to attend in-person evaluation. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Moore, Filed On: February 27, 2024, Case #: 2022-1264, Categories: Veterans
J. Taranto finds the lower court properly found no violation in this patent infringement matter. Freshub sued Amazon claiming it infringed on its patents for voice-processing technology, voice technology used in devices such as smart speakers, that when spoken to, can detect words and create shopping lists. A jury found no infringement on the part of Amazon relating to the patents, and rejected Amazon’s assertion that patents of Freshub’s parent company should be declared invalid based on inadequate description. The instant court finds no error in the lower courts determination. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: February 26, 2024, Case #: 22-1391, Categories: Patent
J. Taranto finds that the district court improperly ruled in claims concerning a patent for speech recognition services because the court incorrectly construed certain claim terms.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: February 16, 2024, Case #: 22-1939, Categories: Patent